| Processing Steps |
- Parameter or Variable: Jumbile Phase II Orthoimagery (A) (measured); Units: pixels; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Jumbile Phase II imagery was captured in two drone flights: Jumbile Phase 2A - A DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK was flown at 91m altitude at a flight speed of 7 m/s covering an area of ~62.3 acres. Ground sampling distance for the drone imagery was calculated to be 2.6cm/pixel resolution. 250 images were taken with 75% overlap/sidelap and used to create an RGB orthomosaic of the field site. 7 ground control points were placed throughout the site and used to create a digital elevation model.; Data Quality Method: Ground control points.
- Parameter or Variable: Jumbile Phase II Orthoimagery (B) (measured); Units: pixels; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Jumbile Phase II imagery was captured in two drone flights: Jumbile Phase 2B - A DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK was flown at 91m altitude at a flight speed of 8 m/s covering an area of ~78.1 acres. Ground sampling distance for the drone imagery was calculated to be 2.6cm/pixel resolution. 268 images were taken with 75% overlap/sidelap and used to create an RGB orthomosaic of the field site. 4 ground control points were placed throughout the site and used to create a digital elevation model.; Data Quality Method: Ground control points.
- Parameter or Variable: J Cove Orthoimagery (measured); Units: pixels; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Jumbile Cove - A DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK was flown at 91m altitude at a flight speed of 8 m/s covering an area of ~227.6 acres. Ground sampling distance for the drone imagery was calculated to be 2.6cm/pixel resolution. 1050 images were taken with 75% overlap/sidelap and used to create an RGB orthomosaic of the field site. 4 ground control points were placed throughout the site and used to create a digital elevation model.; Data Quality Method: Ground control points.
- Parameter or Variable: Mcallis Orthoimagery (measured); Units: pixels; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK; Sampling and Analyzing Method: McAllis - A DJI Phantom 4 Pro RTK was flown at 91m altitude at a flight speed of 9 m/s covering an area of ~227.6 acres. Ground sampling distance for the drone imagery was calculated to be 2.6cm/pixel resolution. 958 images were taken with 75% overlap/sidelap and used to create an RGB orthomosaic of the field site. 4 ground control points were placed throughout the site and used to create a digital elevation model.; Data Quality Method: Ground control points.
- Parameter or Variable: GPS Point Name (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Name used to identify GPS point taken with Trimble. Names reflect the restoration site, mound identifier, and point number. Sites include: Jumbile Phase II (J2), J Cove (J), and Mcallis Point (M). Jumbile Phase II was completed in 2004. J Cove and McAllis Point were completed in 2010.; Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Collection Date (measured); Units: mm/dd/yyyy; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Date recorded when point was shot on Trimble unit.; Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Northing (measured); Units: m, UTM 15N; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Walking/Biking Survey, 3 seconds shots; Data Quality Method: Repeat shots on nearby benchmark
- Parameter or Variable: Easting (measured); Units: m, UTM 15N; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Walking/Biking Survey, 3 seconds shots; Data Quality Method: Repeat shots on nearby benchmark
- Parameter or Variable: Elevation (measured); Units: m NAVD88; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Walking/Biking Survey, 3 seconds shots; Data Quality Method: Repeat shots on nearby benchmark
- Parameter or Variable: Point Code (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: Trimble R12 GNSS System; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Point codes were used to differentiate types of GPS points. The "bike" points were taken by biking the trimble unit while taking points continously. The "gcp" points are ground control points used to validate the drone imagery. The "core" points are the location of sediment cores.; Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Site (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: human; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Site names were previous established during restoration. Sites include: Jumbile Phase II, J Cove, and Mcallis Point. Jumbile Phase II was completed in 2004. J Cove and McAllis Point were completed in 2010.; Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Mound ID (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: human; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Marsh mounds had identifiers that were estiblished in previous studies or given arbitrarily to distingish individual mounds (26, 5, 5C, 4E, or Nat= natural/reference); Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Core Elevation ID (high or low) (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: human; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Cores were taken at either low or high elevation relative to each other (L or H).; Data Quality Method: not applicable
- Parameter or Variable: Core ID (measured); Units: not applicable; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: polycarbonate core tube with 7cm diameter; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Cores were collected from marsh mounds at each restoration site, using polycarbonate tubes with a 7 cm diameter. The core name reflects the site(J2= Jumbile Phase II, J= J Cove, M= Mcallis Point), the marsh mound identifier (26, 5, 5C, 4E, Nat (natural/reference)), the elevation (high(H) or low(L)), and the repitition (A or B).; Data Quality Method: replicate cores taken
- Parameter or Variable: Core Depth Interval (measured); Units: centimeters; Observation Category: in situ; Sampling Instrument: ruler, knife; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Each core was sliced into 5 centimeter increments along the total length of the core. The depth interval indicates the depth of sediment along the whole core.
- Parameter or Variable: Bulk Density (g/cm^3) (calculated); Units: grams per centimeter cubed; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: drying oven; Sampling and Analyzing Method: Half of the 5 cm core interval was dried in an oven at 60C then weighed. The dry weight was multiplied by 2 (to compensate for splitting the core in half) to and then divided by the core volume to determine bulk density.; Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: LOI (%) (calculated); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: muffle furnace; Sampling and Analyzing Method: The top 5 cm of cores was combusted in a muffle furnace at 450C for 4 hours, then weighed to determine loss on ignition (LOI); Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: Gravel % (calculated); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: >0.2mm sieve; Sampling and Analyzing Method: The other half of the 5 cm core interval was sieved into 4 categories: gravel, macro organic matter (both >0.2mm), sand (0.063-2mm), and silt (<0.063mm). After sieving, samples are dried and weighed. The weight of the fraction is divided by total weight to determine percent grain size.; Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: MOM % (measured); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: >0.2mm sieve; Sampling and Analyzing Method: The other half of the 5 cm core interval was sieved into 4 categories: gravel, macro organic matter (both >0.2mm), sand (0.063-2mm), and silt (<0.063mm). After sieving, samples are dried and weighed. The weight of the fraction is divided by total weight to determine percent grain size.; Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: Sand % (calculated); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: 0.063-2mm sieves; Sampling and Analyzing Method: The other half of the 5 cm core interval was sieved into 4 categories: gravel, macro organic matter (both >0.2mm), sand (0.063-2mm), and silt (<0.063mm). After sieving, samples are dried and weighed. The weight of the fraction is divided by total weight to determine percent grain size.; Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: Silt % (calculated); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: <0.063 sieve; Sampling and Analyzing Method: The other half of the 5 cm core interval was sieved into 4 categories: gravel, macro organic matter (both >0.2mm), sand (0.063-2mm), and silt (<0.063mm). After sieving, samples are dried and weighed. The weight of the fraction is divided by total weight to determine percent grain size.; Data Quality Method: calibrated scale
- Parameter or Variable: Average % Carbon (calculated); Units: percentage; Observation Category: laboratory analysis; Sampling Instrument: Perkin Elmer CHN elemental analyzer; Sampling and Analyzing Method: A subsample of the core measured for bulk density was ground into a powder. The ground powder is weighed out and run through and elemental analyzer. The percent carbon of each core section was determined by the elemental analyzer. Duplicate samples were run for each interval of the two were taken.; Data Quality Method: replicate samples
|