Metadata for Generalized Intertidal Vegetation Inventory 1995, Whatcom County Area, Washington

(iveg95vc.*)

Table of Contents

Identification_Information
     Abstract 
     Purpose 
     Supplemental Information 
Data_Quality_Information
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information
Spatial_Reference_Information
Entity_and_Attribute_Information
     Detailed Description
     Overview 
Distribution_Information
Metadata_Reference_Section



Identification_Information Citation_Information Originator: Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division. Publication_Date: 19970630 Title: Intertidal Vegetation Inventory 1995, Whatcom County Area, WA. Description Abstract Dataset consists of a polygon coverage repesenting eight intertidal vegetation types, classified according to Nearshore Habitat Program's vegetation mapping procedures. Dataset was generalized from a more detailed raster dataset. Includes information on vegetation type, location and areal extent. Purpose To provide resource managers, planners and other decision-makers with information about intertidal vegetation. The data were collected as part of the Nearshore Habitat Program's mandate to map the abundance and distribution of nearshore habitats in the Puget Sound for the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program (PSAMP). Supplemental_Information (1) Washington State is divided into two State Plane zones, north and south. The data set's coordinate values are reported in Washington State Plane south. (2) Imagery was acquired during periods of maximum intertidal exposure (0 -- mean lower low water or below in most areas), and times when sun angle would reduce sun glint. (3) This dataset was generalized from the raster Intertidal Vegetation Inventory 1995. The purpose of generalization was to provide a vector-based version of the dataset with a manageable file size. (4) For overview of source dataset see metadata for Intertidal Vegetation Inventory 1995, Whatcom County Area, Washington. (5) Detailed documentation of methods used to create the nearshore vegetation data set can be found in Berry & Ritter (1997). Revisions 1.0.0 References_Cited Berry, H.D. and R.A. Ritter. 1997. Puget Sound Intertidal Habitat Inventory 1995: Vegetation and Shoreline Characteristics Classification Methods. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division. Borstad, G. (1996). The Nearshore Habitat Inventory Project Task 7: Project Summary Memorandum. Unpublished report prepared by Borstad Associates Ltd. for Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division, Olympia, WA-USA. Time_Period_of_Content Range_of_Dates/Times Beginning_Date: 19950712 Ending_Date: 19950813 Currentness_Reference Publication Date Status Progress: complete Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency The dataset represents environmental features at one instance in time. Therefore, updates to the environmental features in the dataset are not planned. New coverages will be created to reflect environmental conditions at a different time period. Updates to correct classification errors will be completed as needed. Spatial_Domain Bounding_Coordinates West_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.79642301 East_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.47676789 North_Bounding_Coordinate: 48.91402362 South_Bounding_Coordinate: 48.63660369 Keywords Theme Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Theme_Keyword: habitat, nearshore vegetation, wetland, multispectral imagery, intertidal, eelgrass, kelp, algae, salt marsh, spit / berm vegetation Place Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Place_Keyword: Whatcom County Area, Washington, USA, Puget Sound Stratum Stratum_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Stratum_Keyword: Temporal Temporal_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Temporal_Keyword: July 1995, August 1995 Access_Constraints: None Use_Constraints (1) Other classification systems and regulatory programs may define and describe nearshore or intertidal vegetation in a different manner than that used in this inventory. (2) This dataset was created for use at 1:24,000 scale or smaller. (3) This information was developed for regional analysis and planning, not for site-specific planning purposes. (4) Features reflect environmental conditions in nearshore vegetation conditions at a point in time (July 12, 1995 or August 13, 1995). (5) Do not copy, modify, or distribute the dataset. (6) While efforts have been made to ensure these data are accurate and reliable, Washington State Department of Natural Resources cannot assume liability for any damages, or misrepresentations, caused by any inaccuracies in the data. Washington State Department of Natural Resources makes no warranty, expressed or implied, nor does the fact of distribution constitute such a warranty. Point_of_Contact Contact_Information Contact_Organization_Primary: Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing address Address: PO Box 47027 City: Olympia State_or_Province: Washington Postal_Code: 98504-7027 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: (360) 902-1100 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (360) 902-1786 Data_Set_Credit Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division, Nearshore Habitat Program; Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program. Security_Information Security_Classification_System: None Security_Classification: Unclassified Security_Handling_Description: None Native_Data_Set_Environment: Solaris 2.5 UNIX, ARC/INFO version 7.1.1

Data_Quality_Information Attribute_Accuracy Attribute_Accuracy_Report: A classification accuracy assessment by vegetation type was performed. When field reference data were in hard copy form, marine scientists used plots to evaluate the land cover type accuracy; digital field sites were overlaid onto the classified file and evaluated on screen. Overall accuracy was 72.1%. See Berry & Ritter (1997) for producers accuracy, users accuracy and other information. Quantitative_Attribute_Accuracy_Assessment Attribute_Accuracy_Value: Attribute_Accuracy_Explanation: Logical_Consistency_Report: Polygon topology present. Data set was reviewed and determined to have a valid range of values. Completeness_Report Sites that have a total vegetation cover greater than 25 percent are mapped as a vegetation type. All nearshore vegetation areas were mapped into one of eight types. Positional_Accuracy Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Quantitative_Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Value: +/-40 feet for most areas at original resolution. Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation: Root mean square error calculated in conjunction with rectfication transformation. Vertical_Positional_Accuracy Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Not determined. Lineage: Source_Information Source_Citation Citation_Information Originator: Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Divison, Nearshore Habitat Program Publication_Date: none Title: Intertidal Vegetation Inventory 1995, Whatcom County Area, Washington Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image Source_Scale_Denominator: 0 Type_of_Source_Media: 8 mm magnetic tape Source_Time_Period_of_Content Time_Period_Information Single_Date/Time Calendar_Date: 19950712, 19950813 Source_Currentness_Reference: source imagery date Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Source_Contribution: The nearshore vegetation inventory was the primary dataset used to produce the generalized vector intertidal vegetation inventory. The following steps were used: boundary smoothing, vector conversion, elimination of polygons smaller than approximately 690 square feet, and buffering of spit/berm vegetation types. See Process Steps and Berry & Ritter (1997) for more information. Source_Information Source_Citation Citation_Information Originator: G.A. Borstad and Associates Ltd. under contract to Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Divison, Nearshore Habitat Program Publication_Date: none Title: 1995 Compact Airborne Spectographic Imager, Nearshore Airborne Multispectral Imagery, Whatcom County Area Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image Source_Scale_Denominator: 0 Type_of_Source_Media: 8 mm magnetic tape Source_Time_Period_of_Content Time_Period_Information Single_Date/Time Calendar_Date: 199507, 199508 Source_Currentness_Reference: source imagery date Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Source_Contribution: Airborne multispectral imagery was used as the primary data set for the nearshore vegetation inventory. Source_Information Source_Citation Citation_Information Originator: Sound Aerial Surveys under contract to Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Divison, Nearshore Habitat Program Publication_Date: None Title: 1995 Nearshore Habitat Low Tide Color Infrared Aerial Photography Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image Source_Scale_Denominator: 11,000 Type_of_Source_Media: color infrared transparency(9" x 9") Source_Time_Period_of_Content Time_Period_Information Single_Date/Time Calendar_Date: 19950712, 19950813 Source_Currentness_Reference: source photography date Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Source_Contribution: Color infrared aerial photography, acquired simulataneously with the multispectral imagery, was an ancillary data set in developing the nearshore vegetation inventory. Source_Information Source_Citation Citation_Information Originator: Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Divison, Nearshore Habitat Program Publication_Date: None Title: 1995 Nearshore Habitat Program Field Surveys Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: ground based Source_Scale_Denominator: 13,000 and 11,000 Type_of_Source_Media: annotation on color infrared contact print; annotation on imagery plots; GPS-located, differentially-corrected field sites and associated forms. Source_Time_Period_of_Content Time_Period_Information Single_Date/Time Calendar_Date: 1995 Source_Currentness_Reference: source information date Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Source_Contribution: Aerial photography and imagery (map scale from 1:11,000-1:13,000) used as base to record field data (spatial and attribute information). Information was used to guide nerashore vegetation classification or as a classification accuracy assessment site. Process Steps: Process Description The Raster dataset was generalized and converted to vector format in order to: be used with the standard DNR vector-based cartographic production, to provide information for systems with limited Raster manipulation capabilities, and to reduce the number of features and arcs in the coverage to a manageable number for common computer system configurations. The objective was to simplify the coverage while maintaining the salient characteristics of vegetation features at an appropriate scale. The following steps were applied: (1) Mosaic blocks were joined into a single grid file for the study area, and then separated by vegetation type for generalization. (2) An ArcInfo GRID (ESRI,Redlands, California) focal filter function was used to smooth feature boundaries. Smoothed grids for each vegetation type were then recombined according to a hierarchy, so that in cases where a pixel was assigned multiple vegetation values, the higher priority vegetation type was retained. The assignment hierarchy was based on the relative significance of vegetation types in management and environmental decision making: eelgrass (highest), kelp, salt marsh, spit berm, mixed algae, brown algae, green algae (lowest). The recombined grid was then converted into a polygon coverage. (3) Features with an area equal to four or fewer pixels (approximately 690 square feet) were eliminated. The elimination decreased the total number of features by two-thirds, while changing the total acreage by less than 5 percent. In determining the size of features to eliminate, the effect of elimination on visual appearance turned out to be more important than the effect on total vegetation acreage because the size distribution of vegetation features was skewed. As a result, the visual appearance of the coverage could change markedly without a corresponding change in acreage. The narrow, linear vegetation features areas were most affected by area elimination thresholds. They were evaluated at 1:12,000 scale to decide which elimination threshold best maintained feature representation. Note: Detailed documentation of methods used to create the nearshore vegetation dataset can be found in Berry & Ritter (1997)
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector Point_and_Vector_Object_Information SDTS_Terms_Description SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 3133 SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: String Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 7390 SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: GT-polygon composed of chains' Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 3133
Spatial_Reference_Information Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition Planar Grid_Coordinate_System Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: State_Plane_Coordinate_System Zone_Number: 5626 (U.S. Geological Survey Code) Planar_Distance_Units: feet Geodetic Model Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1927 Ellipsoid_Name: Clarke 1866 Semi-major_Axis: 6,378,206.4 Denominator_of_Flattening: 294.98
Entity_and_Attribute_Information Detailed_Description Entity_Type Entity_Type_Label: Polygon attributes (IVEG95VC.PAT, IVEG95vc.*) Entity_Type_Definition: Polygon attribute table containing intertidal vegetation inventory for Whatcom County Area, classified according to the Nearshore Habitat Program's eight nearshore vegetation types. Entity_Type_Definition_Source: Nearshore Habitat Program. Mumford et al (1992) and Berry & Ritter (1997). Attribute: Attribute_Label: AREA Attribute_Definition: Area of poly/region in square coverage units Attribute_Definition_Source: Computed Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: Positive real numbers Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Attribute: Attribute_Label: PERIMETER Attribute_Definition: Perimeter of poly/region in coverage units Attribute_Definition_Source: Computed Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: Positive real numbers Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Attribute: Attribute_Label: IVEG95VC# Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number Attribute_Definition_Source: Computed Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: Sequential unique positive integer Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Attribute: Attribute_Label: IVEG95VC-ID Attribute_Definition: User-defined Attribute_Definition_Source: User-defined Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: Integer Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Attribute: Attribute_Label: GRID-CODE Attribute_Definition: numeric value representing nearshore vegetation type classification Attribute_Definition_Source: Nearshore Habitat Program multispectral image classification, guided by field data collection on vegetation type. Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: 1 = brown algae 2 = green algae 3 = mixed algae 4 = red algae 5 = eelgrass 6 = kelp 7 = salt marsh 8 = spit / berm vegetation Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition Brown Algae - Algae belonging to the taxonomic group Division Phaeophyta. Some common representatives in Puget Sound include rockweed (Fucus spp.) and Sargassum muticum. Kelp - Large brown algae in the taxonomic group Order Laminariales. Some common representatives in Puget Sound include floating kelp (Nereocystis luetkeana) and understory kelp (Laminaria spp.). Because of its recognized ecological function and management importance, kelp is distinguished from other brown algae when it makes up greater than 75% of the vegetated cover. Eelgrass - The vascular plants Zostera marina, and Zostera japonica. Eelgrass beds are recognized as critical habitat in the life cycles of many fishes, invertebrates and birds. Green Algae - Algae belonging to taxonomic group Division Chlorophyta. A common representative in Puget Sound region is sea lettuce (Ulva spp.). Red Algae - Algae belonging to taxonomic group Division Rhodophyta. A common representative in Puget Sound region is nori (Porphyra spp.). Areas dominated by red algae and large enough to map at this resolution rarely occur in the summer in the intertidal zone of Puget Sound. Mixed Algae - Areas in which red, green, or brown algae coexist, but no single type occupies more than 75% of the vegetated cover. Salt Marsh - Salt-tolerant, emergent wetland plants such as pickleweed (Salicornia virginica), saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), and sedge (Carex lyngbyei). Freshwater marsh areas were not included in the inventory. Spit and Berm Communities - Areas dominantly covered with plants such as dune grass (Elymus mollis), gumweed (Grindelia integrifolia), and yarrow (Achillea millefolium), which generally occur above the highest tides but still receive salt influence. The substrate is usually sand or gravel, and drift logs commonly accumulate. Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Nearshore Habitat Program, Berry & Ritter (1997) Attribute: Attribute_Label: IVEG_CD Attribute_Definition: User-defined Attribute_Definition_Source: See information on Attribute GRID_CODE Attribute_Domain_Values Enumerated_Domain Enumerated_Domain_Value: bro = brown algae eel = eelgrass gre = gree algae kel = kelp mix = mixed algae red = red algae msh = salt marsh spb = spit / berm vegetation Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition See information on Attribute GRID_CODE Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: Nearshore Habitat Program, Berry & Ritter (1997) Related_Spatial_and_Tabular_Data_Sets The Intertidal Vegetation Inventory attribute codes can be related to classification categories using the IVEG_CD table. The following fields are included: IVEG_NAME: description of vegetation type VALUE: numeric code identifying vegetation type classification GRID-CODE: numeric code field created by ARC/INFO identifying vegetation type classification (same as VALUE attribute) IVEG_CD: three letter code identifying vegetation type classification. Overview_Description Entity_and_Attribute_Overview This layer delineates nearshore vegetation types in the Whatcom County Area. Vegetation types are classified according to the Nearshore Habitat Program's vegetation mapping procedures. Descriptive attributes include vegetation type (identified by numeric and alphabetic attributes), and feature measurements (length, area, perimeter). This dataset was generalized from the raster Intertidal Vegetation Inventory.
Distribution_Information Distributor Contact_Organization_Primary Contact_Organization: Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources,Aquatic Resources Division Contact_Address Address_Type: mailing address Address: PO Box 47027 City: Olympia State_or_Province: Washington Postal_Code: 98504-7027 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: (360) 902-1100 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (360) 902-1786 Resource_Description: This dataset is part of the Intertidal Habitat Inventory 1995, Whatcom County Area,WA on CDROM. Standard_Order_Process Digital_Form Digital_Transfer_Information Format_Name: ARC/INFO export file (iveg95vc.e00) and shapefile (iveg95vc.dbf, iveg95vc.shp, iveg95vc.shx) Format_version_number: ARC/INFO 7.1.1 Format_specifications: Digital_Transfer_Option Offline_Option Offline_Media: CDROM Recording_Format ISO 9660 Compatibility_Information: ISO 9660 format allows the CDROM contents to be accessible to any computer on most operating systems. Fees: None
Metadata_Reference_Section Metadata_Date: 19970603 Metadata_Contact: Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Metadata_Standard_Version: 19940608 Metadata_Time_Convention: Local Time Metadata_Security_Information: Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None Metadata_Security_Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None
Last modified: 97-06-11